|
From: | Aaron Hill |
Subject: | Re: v2.19.82 documentation unusable? |
Date: | Sat, 24 Nov 2018 14:17:29 -0800 |
User-agent: | Roundcube Webmail/1.3.6 |
On 2018-11-24 7:03 am, Michael Gerdau wrote:
I am curious then as to why it all works fine for me and presumably others? Sounds like a Mac font problem to me, given my other current experiencewith Alegreya, as initially raised by Kieren. Or has 2.19.82 been rebuilt since I downloaded it some time ago? I may be wrong!Just checked, and the PDFs on the site have not been changed and are still broken.Just looked at the 2.19.82 notation.pdf with my iPhone (read: clearly no lilypond fonts installed locally) and by briefly browsing through it I could not detect any broken images. So I’m not convinced your analysis is completely correct.
Are you sure you are looking at the 2.19.82 version? I would be *very* surprised to find a PDF viewer that can magically summon fonts from the aether, because they are very much not there.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation.pdf Output from pdffonts:
pdffonts notation.pdf | grep -iv "builtin" | head -n 10
name type encoding emb sub uni object ID ------------------------------------ ----------------- ---------------- --- --- --- --------- Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom no no yes 642 0 TeXGyreSchola-Italic Type 1 WinAnsi no no no 645 0 Emmentaler-Brace Type 1 Custom no no no 648 0 Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom no no yes 656 0 TeXGyreSchola-Regular Type 1 WinAnsi no no no 658 0 Emmentaler-Brace Type 1 Custom no no no 661 0 Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom no no no 668 0 Emmentaler-20 Type 1 Custom no no no 678 0
-- Aaron Hill
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |