[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?]
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?] |
Date: |
Sat, 17 Nov 2018 01:27:48 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Kieren MacMillan <address@hidden> writes:
> Hi,
>
>> On Nov 16, 2018, at 6:29 PM, Flaming Hakama by Elaine
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> % I'm not sure how to do this globally, but the normal \shape
>> command can be made to work.
>> slurTweak = { \shape #'((0.3 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (-0.3 . 0)) Slur }
>
> Yes, this (with 0.2 instead of 0.3) is perfect for my use-case.
>
> Eventually, I would love to have the ability to set the attachment
> globally, rather than having to add this tweak before every
> Slur.
I am irritated that \shape applies \once automatically. If you use it
in a context modification \with { ... }, however, \once will get
ignored and the shape will apply to the whole context.
--
David Kastrup
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], (continued)
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], David Kastrup, 2018/11/16
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], Kieren MacMillan, 2018/11/16
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], David Kastrup, 2018/11/16
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], Kieren MacMillan, 2018/11/16
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], Aaron Hill, 2018/11/16
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], Kieren MacMillan, 2018/11/16
- Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], Lukas-Fabian Moser, 2018/11/17
Re: controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], Andrew Bernard, 2018/11/17
Re:controlling the tie "gap" [and a possible bug?], Flaming Hakama by Elaine, 2018/11/16