Re: Fwd: autochange and tuplet brackets

[Simon Bailey]

On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:33 AM, Urs Liska <address@hidden> wrote:

<...SNIPSNAP...>
notation is less complex for the player, but not being a pianist, i'm
not sure if it would be considered the "correct" way to do it. if not,
i'm open to suggestions on how better to notate this section. i haven't
consulted gould on the matter yet, but will do so this evening.

As a pianist I'd say this notation is perfectly clear. I'm even quite sure that it's a very common notation for such distributed repetitions (but I don't have my scores at home, so I can't check). But maybe looking at some IMSLP scores of Liszt studies might be even better than looking up Gould ;-)

that was a good tip -- turned up the amazing cross-staff beams attached... :D (i'll have to try this with lilypond...).

I would say LilyPond should handle this automatically, so I'd vote for "bug".

mark knoop just confirmed this has already been discussed on the -devel list. 

regards,

sb

--
Do not meddle in the affairs of trombonists, for they are subtle and quick to anger.