[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Advocating non-free softwares
From: |
Kieren MacMillan |
Subject: |
Re: Advocating non-free softwares |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2013 09:14:30 -0500 |
> I suggest rereading the thread in context, taking note about who wrote
> what, and then checking your summary to be accurate, fair and matched in
> style to all those contributing to the thread that have ventured an
> opinion differing from yours.
Done. And it didn't change my opinion that some people in this thread have
crossed the line into inflammatory advocacy.
> And if one is really, really loath to doing that, then erring on the
> calmer side of recollection might be safer.
Actually, erring on the side of not recalling this thread at all will be best,
I should think.
Kieren.
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Tim Roberts, 2013/02/26
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, David Kastrup, 2013/02/26
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, ryanmichaelmcclure, 2013/02/26
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, David Kastrup, 2013/02/26
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/02/26
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, David Kastrup, 2013/02/26
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/02/26
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, David Kastrup, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, David Kastrup, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares,
Kieren MacMillan <=
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, David Kastrup, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Joseph Rushton Wakeling, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, James Harkins, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Kieren MacMillan, 2013/02/27
- Re: Advocating non-free softwares, Janek WarchoĊ, 2013/02/27