Re: v2.15.24: void-, scheme- or music-function in toc-section?

[David Kastrup]

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Thomas Morley <address@hidden> writes:
>>
>> Did I misunderstood (because of my insufficient english-skills)?
>
> I don't see where you get the impression that anything constructed via
> #{ ... #} is fit for returning from a music function.

Talk about insufficient English skills.  Make that "the impression that
_everything_ constructed via" and possibly "should be suitable" instead
of "is fit".

-- 
David Kastrup