[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: duration and pitch in a function
From: |
Matthew Collett |
Subject: |
Re: duration and pitch in a function |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 17:58:36 +1300 |
On 9/12/2011, at 2:27 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>> On 8/12/2011, at 10:48 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Please, *never*, *never*, *never* send a "courtesy copy" of a public
>>> answer as a private mail when answering on a mailing list unless you
>>> have been _explicitly_ asked to provide such a copy.
>>
>> Normally I'd agree with you, but in fairness to Paolo I observe that
>> this is the only mailing list I am or ever have been a member of in
>> which the default behaviour is to reply to the sender (only) rather
>> than to the list. I have in consequence more than once
>> unintentionally sent a separate "courtesy copy" message.
>
> You arae confusing a _separate_ "courtesy copy", namely one for which
> the _only_ recipient in the headers is the person you are replying to,
> with _including_ the intended recipient in the list of recipients of the
> _same_ mail.
No, I am not: a separate message is what I said, and what I meant. Because the
list reply defaults to the sender _only_, unless I remember explicitly to
choose "Reply All" (which I otherwise rarely use) any message I mean to send to
the list goes instead to just the individual. I then have to send a separate
copy to the list (only), making my first reply retrospectively and
unintentionally a "courtesy copy". The last occasion that happened was just
yesterday. And as I said, I do not have this problem with any other mailing
list.
Best wishes,
Matthew
- duration and pitch in a function, Paolo Prete, 2011/12/07
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, David Kastrup, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, David Kastrup, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2011/12/12
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, David Kastrup, 2011/12/12