[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: duration and pitch in a function
From: |
Matthew Collett |
Subject: |
Re: duration and pitch in a function |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Dec 2011 10:58:44 +1300 |
On 8/12/2011, at 10:48 pm, David Kastrup wrote:
> Please, *never*, *never*, *never* send a "courtesy copy" of a public
> answer as a private mail when answering on a mailing list unless you
> have been _explicitly_ asked to provide such a copy.
>
> Otherwise, you set up _two_ different communication channels that the
> person you are showing your "courtesy" then has to answer separately.
> It is a great nuisance and additional work and hassle.
Normally I'd agree with you, but in fairness to Paolo I observe that this is
the only mailing list I am or ever have been a member of in which the default
behaviour is to reply to the sender (only) rather than to the list. I have in
consequence more than once unintentionally sent a separate "courtesy copy"
message.
Best wishes,
Matthew
- duration and pitch in a function, Paolo Prete, 2011/12/07
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, David Kastrup, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, David Kastrup, 2011/12/11
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, Jan-Peter Voigt, 2011/12/12
- Re: duration and pitch in a function, David Kastrup, 2011/12/12