lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: High-level users?


From: Janek Warchoł
Subject: Re: High-level users?
Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:42:15 +0200

2011/9/25 Hilary Snaden <address@hidden>:
> On 2011-09-25 11:13, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>
>> 2011/9/24 Graham Percival<address@hidden>:
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
>>>>
>>>> For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
>>>> MuseScore should be integrated.
>>>
>>> What does that mean?
>>>
>>> - better lilypond export for musescore: go ahead and send patches
>>>  there.
>>> - lilypond import for musescore: go ahead and send patches there.
>>
>> No, i mean *a lot* more.  Therefore it's too big for me to handle
>> alone - that's why i'm aksing who's interested in it.  There'd be no
>> point in writing my thoughts on this topic down and sending them to
>> the list if noone would be interested.
>
> The last time I tried Musescore (with part of a project I was working rather
> slowly on with LilyPond) it was far too unstable to be usable.

When was it?

> Since then
> I've learned more about LilyPond and become faster at coding, and haven't
> felt a need to try MuseScore again. Maybe MuseScore has improved since then,
> and maybe MuseScore and LilyPond can be made to talk to one another better,
> but I'd really really hate to see LilyPond become in any way dependent on
> point-and-click systems.

Of course i don't mean this.  It should always be possible to use Lily
from a text interface.

cheers,
Janek



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]