Re: High-level users?

[Hilary Snaden]

On 2011-09-25 11:13, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2011/9/24 Graham Percival<address@hidden>:
> > On Sat, Sep 24, 2011 at 03:24:18PM +0200, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> > > For what it's worth, i really *really* think that LilyPond and
> > > MuseScore should be integrated.
> >
> > What does that mean?
> >
> > - better lilypond export for musescore: go ahead and send patches
> >   there.
> > - lilypond import for musescore: go ahead and send patches there.
>
> No, i mean *a lot* more.  Therefore it's too big for me to handle
> alone - that's why i'm aksing who's interested in it.  There'd be no
> point in writing my thoughts on this topic down and sending them to
> the list if noone would be interested.

The last time I tried Musescore (with part of a project I was working 
rather slowly on with LilyPond) it was far too unstable to be usable. 
Since then I've learned more about LilyPond and become faster at coding, 
and haven't felt a need to try MuseScore again. Maybe MuseScore has 
improved since then, and maybe MuseScore and LilyPond can be made to 
talk to one another better, but I'd really really hate to see LilyPond 
become in any way dependent on point-and-click systems. In fact, I think 
they should remain as separate as, say, LilyPond and Emacs.

--
Hilary