lilypond-user
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break


From: Kieren MacMillan
Subject: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break
Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 17:10:28 -0400

Hi all (esp. Valentin):

Last month, there was a quick exchange about hiding accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/ msg00949.html>

I am running into the same issue right now, and I see why others have been frustrated by it... =\ 1. Does anybody have an automatic way to get this to work as expected*? Maybe a callback function a la the broken slur example? 2. Valentin: is there already an issue on the tracker to have this handled better? If not, can you please add it?

Thanks,
Kieren.

* I've searched through every score I own, and cannot find *any* that duplicate Lilypond's behaviour -- even my dodecaphonic scores [!!] omit the accidental(s) on line-broken tied notes. If you think about it, it makes sense: you don't want to make the player wonder whether the note has changed over the line break (i.e., that the tie is really a slur between notes of different pitches/alterations).




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]