Re: [Issue?] hiding Accidental(s) on tied note(s) after a line break

[Kieren MacMillan]

Hi all,

Earlier (on -user), I wrote:

> Last month, there was a quick exchange about hiding accidental(s)  
> on tied note(s) after a line break:
>     <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-04/ 
> msg00949.html>
>
> I am running into the same issue right now, and I see why others  
> have been frustrated by it...  =\
>     1. Does anybody have an automatic way to get this to work as  
> expected*? Maybe a callback function a la the broken slur example?

I've been trying to put together a callback function (riffing on the  
broken slur and tie examples), but since Accidental doesn't get  
broken itself — although the Tie attached to the note the Accidental  
belongs to must [right?] — the necessary alteration to the code is  
beyond my Scheme-fu.

Any helpers out there?
I've got a little PayPal balance to spend, if that moves the issue up  
the priority list any...  ;)

Thanks,
Kieren.