Re: GDP: rearrangement (third attempt)

[Mats Bengtsson]

Graham Percival wrote:
> > >                + 6.6.2 Stems
> >
> > Currently, this subsection has nothing to do with polyphony.
> > Furthermore it is layout specific, and should therefore be postponed.
>
> I have _always_ hated this section.  I remember trying -- and failing 
> -- to find a home for it when I did my very first doc rearrangement, 
> and it's still a pain.
>
> Help?  Anybody have a suggestion for where to move this to?  (or 
> perhaps delete entirely, and put info about \stemDown... where?)
How about some combined subsection on (ordinary) notes which deals with 
both
note heads and stems? Currently, we don't have any specific subsection 
on note
heads (though there are a few related to special notation). Any section 
that
describes \xxxDown and \xxxUp macros should also refer to the section
that describes \voiceOne and \voiceTwo, since that's mostly a better 
solution.
(Sorry, couldn't help leaving the structure and talking about content 
for a moment).

   /Mats