[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nested segno and volta repeats
From: |
Thomas Morley |
Subject: |
Re: Nested segno and volta repeats |
Date: |
Sun, 29 May 2022 13:33:00 +0200 |
Am So., 29. Mai 2022 um 13:25 Uhr schrieb Luca Fascione <l.fascione@gmail.com>:
>
> What do you mean Thomas? When the sheet clearly indicates DC al Fine (Da
> Capo, from the beginning) why would it be normal to ignore such an explicit
> direction?
Maybe I was not clear enough. For
||: A :|| B ||
Fine D.C. Al Fine
The "Fine" may be regarded as ambiguous.
By _convention_ above is played A A B A and not A A B A A.
But a composer could be expizit in what he wants.
That's all I wanted to say, hope it's clearer now.
Cheers,
Harm
>
> I wasn't aware of \repeat segno, neat thing, I've always had to do it by hand
> with cadenza trickeries...
>
> L
>
> On Sun, 29 May 2022, 10:45 Thomas Morley, <thomasmorley65@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Am So., 29. Mai 2022 um 09:56 Uhr schrieb Jean Abou Samra
>> <jean@abou-samra.fr>:
>> >
>> > Hi Dan,
>> >
>> > Is there any way to get this repeat structure with the recent
>> > repeat additions? This is from a question on the user list.
>> >
>> > ||: A :|| B ||
>> > Fine D.C. Al Fine
>> >
>> > -> A A B A
>>
>> From a musicians point of view:
>> I've learned not to repeat the final A here, though as a rule of thumb(!).
>> A composer could be expilzit by adding "con/senza repetizione"
>>
>> Afaict, "senza repetizione" is not supported by now.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Harm
>> >
>> >
>> > My first thought was to do
>> >
>> > \version "2.23.10"
>> >
>> > m =
>> > \repeat segno 2 {
>> > \repeat volta 2 {
>> > a'1
>> > }
>> > \volta 2 \fine
>> > b'1
>> > }
>> >
>> > { \m }
>> > { \unfoldRepeats \m }
>> >
>> >
>> > That works about fine, except that the resulting
>> > structure with \unfoldRepeats is A A B A A and
>> > not A A B A. What I need seems to be a kind of
>> > \volta 2 \fine within the inner \repeat volta
>> > that would apply \volta with the outer \repeat
>> > segno. Did miss something like that? Should
>> > it be registered as a feature request?
>> >
>> > Best,
>> > Jean
>> >
>> >
>>