Re: Guile 3.0

[David Kastrup]

Luca Fascione <l.fascione@gmail.com> writes:

> I would like to bring up an option that I'd expect fair few of you will
> _really_ not like.
> I'm doing this not because I necessarily believe it to be a
> particularly good way forward,
> rather because I feel it is sometimes useful to articulate in words why an
> "obviously awful idea" is, in fact, awful. Or maybe it isn't
>
> So here it goes: what if we shipped the guile source? (I mean, in a
> subdirectory of lilypond's source)

What do you mean with "shipped"?  In the repository (which is not what
we ship)?  That would have made some sense with Guile 1.8.  I don't
think it makes sense with stuff that is supposed to be up to date with
current versions.

-- 
David Kastrup