Re: [PoC] EXPERIMENTAL binaries of LilyPond 2.22.1

[Thomas Morley]

Am So., 16. Mai 2021 um 14:40 Uhr schrieb Jonas Hahnfeld <hahnjo@hahnjo.de>:
>
> Am Sonntag, dem 16.05.2021 um 13:58 +0200 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> > Hi Jonas,
> >
> > many thanks for your hard work!
> >
> > I'm testing with Linux 64-bit after having done GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE=1
> > One thing I stumpled across by accident was:
> >
> > \version "2.22.1"
> >
> > \relative c'' {
> >   bes4^"ऌ"
> > }
> >
> > With this example it's a lot, up to 25%, slower than with vanilla lilypond.
>
> Not sure if I understand you: Is Guile 2.2 25% slower than LilyPond
> with Guile 1.8 or the other way around? On my system, I see 0.7 seconds
> for Guile 1.8 and 0.6 seconds with Guile 2.2 (after compiling the
> bytecode). Keep in mind that the times are very short, so the results
> might vary a lot from run to run...
>
> Jonas

On my system the example above lasts with
released 2.22.0 (guile-1)
    3.7 - 4.0 seconds
with current master (guile-1)
    ~2.6 seconds
with your 2.22.1 (guile-2) and compiled bytecode
    4.8 - 5.4 seconds

Cheers,
  Harm