[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Repeat alternative count
From: |
Dan Eble |
Subject: |
Re: Repeat alternative count |
Date: |
Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:02:21 -0400 |
On Aug 29, 2020, at 10:06, Kieren MacMillan <kieren_macmillan@sympatico.ca>
wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>> On Aug 29, 2020, at 10:00 AM, Aaron Hill <lilypond@hillvisions.com> wrote:
>>
>> %%%%
>> \repeat volta 5 {
>> ...
>> }
>> \alternative 1,3 {
>> ...
>> }
>> \alternative 2,4,5 {
>> ...
>> }
>> %%%%
>
> That's pretty nice.
>
> K.
Considering trying not to stray too far from the current syntax, what's your
opinion of this?
\repeat volta 5 {
…
} \alternative {
\volta 1,3 { … }
\volta 2,4,5 { … }
}
Would you mind being limited to all-or-none use of \volta within a given
\alternative{}?
Even with \volta on all elements, would you want to be able to leave some volta
numbers implied, or would you prefer to have LilyPond draw your attention to
the omission? Example:
\repeat volta 10 {
…
} \alternative {
\volta 1,3,9 { … } % 1, 3-4, 9-10
\volta 2,5 { … } % 2, 5-8
}
Regards,
—
Dan