Re: Use GhostScript API instead of forking (issue 548030043 by address@hidden)

[jonas . hahnfeld]

On 2020/05/01 09:49:35, hanwenn wrote:
> LilyPond can also output postscript with embedded fonts, which you
should be
> able to send to a Postscript printer (I have a PS printer too, but
it's a 2001
> model, which probably is too old to deal with OTF/CFF fonts). In this
scenario,
> you don't need Ghostscript, so LilyPond per se doesn't depend on GS.

Sure, but web applications where AGPL is of primary concern are more
likely to provide PDFs or PNGs, both of which are handled via
GhostScript.

https://codereview.appspot.com/548030043/