lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4036 in lilypond: Patch: Revert "Issue 3978: M


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4036 in lilypond: Patch: Revert "Issue 3978: Merge alignment cleanup"
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:06:16 +0000


Comment #11 on issue 4036 by address@hidden: Patch: Revert "Issue 3978: Merge alignment cleanup"
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4036

This seems eminently sensible to me.

At some point, I imagine we would also have a pair of alignment settings
for the Y-axis, too.

I'm curious what the opinion is on allowing values outside the range of -1
to 1.  I know that Janek considers these a misuse, but I've used such
values for self-alignment-X for "moving things around," and I'm certainly
not alone.

If only values between -1 and 1 produced a useful result, and X-offset were
used to move things about, it seems natural to me that an override to
X-offset would respect the alignment settings.  (If they didn't, such
behavior could be created by applying \offset X-offset, but this is hardly
obvious.)

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]