lilypond-auto
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4036 in lilypond: Patch: Revert "Issue 3978: M


From: lilypond
Subject: Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 4036 in lilypond: Patch: Revert "Issue 3978: Merge alignment cleanup"
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 22:57:18 +0000


Comment #7 on issue 4036 by address@hidden: Patch: Revert "Issue 3978: Merge alignment cleanup"
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4036

"This behavior is correct" can be stated only if you change the _definition_ of the correct behavior. The previous behavior is still documented as being correct.

Cf.
<URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/aligning-objects#-Self_002daligning-objects-in-both-directions>
with
<URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/notation/aligning-objects#-Self_002daligning-objects-in-both-directions>

Both effect and description in 2.19 are now bad. This was a sweeping change that will affect a number of tweaks that were done as still suggested in our documentation, in the NR chapter about self-alignment-interface.

And any redefinition of "this behavior is correct" that "leads to behavior users probably won't expect" in a major user-tweakable interface does not sound like a good idea in first approximation.

How can we converge better with documented behavior and user expectations?

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]