Re: [Lilypond-auto] Issue 3560 in lilypond: Completion_heads_engraver with \scaleDurations

[lilypond]

Comment #52 on issue 3560 by address@hidden: Completion_heads_engraver with  
\scaleDurations
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3560

Or what the heck.  completionFactor is the resulting completion factor.  If  
it happens to be a callback, it is called with the original factor.  But  
that will make Keith unhappy who wants to use the _length_ of the duration  
(before or after scaling?) as a deciding factor, so we call that callback  
instead with the whole of the original duration.  Has the disadvantage that  
we can't plug in something as simple as "identity" but maybe we can just  
accept a duration as well as a ratio as return value.  At any rate, then  
everybody has the toolbox to implement whatever behavior he likes.

I still vote for the default of keeping the factor.  It's the only thing  
consistent between split and unsplit notes.

--
You received this message because this project is configured to send all  
issue notifications to this address.
You may adjust your notification preferences at:
https://code.google.com/hosting/settings