[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version numbering
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: Version numbering |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:24:39 +0100 |
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 09:31, Bernd Jendrissek wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 09:33:29AM +0200, Alexandre Duret-Lutz wrote:
> > etc. Keeping odd version for development ensure people cannot
> > mis-sort versions with letters with others. It could also gives
> > some feeling of sense to accustomed to the odd/even version
> > numbering scheme of Linux.
>
> Besides the Linux kernel, what *else* uses that odd/even numbering
> scheme? I have seen a couple, but I can't remember any now.
>
GLib, GTK+, Gimp and GNOME (as well as many to most GNOME apps) spring
immediately to mind.
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V . Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Daniel Reed, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Paul Jarc, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Bernd Jendrissek, 2003/09/30
- RE: Version numbering, Howard Chu, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering,
Scott James Remnant <=
- Re: Version numbering, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Earnie Boyd, 2003/09/30
Re: Version numbering, Peter O'Gorman, 2003/09/29