[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version numbering
|
From: |
Paul Jarc |
|
Subject: |
Re: Version numbering |
|
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:43:52 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
Daniel Reed <address@hidden> wrote:
> Several GNU projects (including GCC) do leave off .0's for anything past the
> minor number, so it seems ls -v can't be the final authority :/
It does not follow that this numbering scheme is a good one. I would
argue that it isn't. The gcc maintainers seemed to be willing to add
.0, but the request didn't come in time for 3.3.
paul
- Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V . Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Daniel Reed, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering,
Paul Jarc <=
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Bernd Jendrissek, 2003/09/30
- RE: Version numbering, Howard Chu, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30