[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version numbering
From: |
Alexandre Duret-Lutz |
Subject: |
Re: Version numbering |
Date: |
Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:50:44 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) |
>>> "Gary" == Gary V Vaughan <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
Gary> And that's why people find our version scheme confusing. I'm not sure
Gary> how we ended up working in this way, I think we copied it from
Gary> Automake?
Tsk tsk tsk. Libtool used that scheme first. Automake copied it
when we started to have branches.
Gary> Anyhow, I'm fed up of having to explain it, when we could
Gary> just make it intuitive :-)
I didn't understand your proposal, but I hope you are not
planning to make 2.2 < 2.3a < 2.3. That would be counter
intuitive. IMHO any numbering scheme ought to work with `ls -v'.
--
Alexandre Duret-Lutz
- Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Bob Friesenhahn, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V . Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering,
Alexandre Duret-Lutz <=
- Re: Version numbering, Daniel Reed, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Paul Jarc, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Bernd Jendrissek, 2003/09/30
- RE: Version numbering, Howard Chu, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30