[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distrib
From: |
Denver Gingerich |
Subject: |
Re: youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distributions |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Oct 2020 17:53:06 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 08:00:33PM +0300, Jean Louis wrote:
> * Ali Reza Hayati <hayati@riseup.net> [2020-10-29 19:33]:
> > First step would be moving from corporate-backed services to services
> > that are run by companies that value human beings/people instead of
> > money. Money is important but the first priority should be people.
Agreed. Or even better, services run by non-profit charities.
As an example, youtube-dl has received offers from non-profit charities to host
their repository, issues tracker, etc. I hope that youtube-dl will take them
up on their offer. These non-profit charities can fight DMCA notices (or
similar notices in other countries) to take down youtube-dl and won't just cave
to RIAA pressure like big companies such as GitHub/Microsoft will.
> > These service should be libre and also out of the U.S. for now as U.S.
> > laws are currently very stupid and discriminatory.
>
> Exactly that.
>
> There is already so much hosting space for free software on its
> mirrors, but if mirror is engaged by the order of US organization, US
> court can give order that US organization shut it down, even if it is
> in other country.
Yes, but the RIAA and others can sue the developers in their home country too.
One youtube-dl developer was threatened in this way in their home country of
Germany (and the RIAA specifically mentioned a German case in their takedown
notice, presumably to threaten the current lead developer of youtube-dl). So
we need to take a more holistic approach to solving this.
> Libreplanet shall make the page with list of free software hosting
> providers that are inside of US jurisdiction and those outside of US
> jurisdiction. That is how to counter the DMCA notices and safety of
> software.
That would be nice to have, but is only a first step. Per above there are a
lot of other solutions we can and should pursue.
Denver
https://jmp.chat/
- Re: Free Software Logo -> Where does FSF go?, (continued)
- Re: Free Software Logo -> Where does FSF go?, Matt Ivie, 2020/10/30
- Re: Free Software Logo, Jean Louis, 2020/10/30
- Re: Free Software Logo, Ali Reza Hayati, 2020/10/29
- Re: Free Software Logo, mray, 2020/10/29
- Re: Free Software Logo, Ali Reza Hayati, 2020/10/29
- youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distributions, Jean Louis, 2020/10/30
- Re: youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distributions, Ali Reza Hayati, 2020/10/29
- Re: youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distributions, Jean Louis, 2020/10/30
- Re: youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distributions, Ali Reza Hayati, 2020/10/29
- Self-hosting Fediverse, and Etesync, Jean Louis, 2020/10/30
- Re: youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distributions,
Denver Gingerich <=
- Re: youtube-dl DMCA takedown on GitHub is risk for all GNU/Linux distributions, Ali Reza Hayati, 2020/10/29
- Re: Free Software Logo, Jean Louis, 2020/10/30
- Re: Free Software Logo, Matt Ivie, 2020/10/30
- Re: Free Software Logo, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2020/10/30
- Message not available
- Re: Fine differences, Adonay Felipe Nogueira, 2020/10/31