Re: Octave

[Sergei Steshenko]

----- Original Message -----
> From: Ben Abbott <address@hidden>
> To: c. <address@hidden>
> Cc: Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden>; eugenio.pariani <address@hidden>; 
> "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 12:36 AM
> Subject: Re: Octave
> 
> 
> On Apr 13, 2014, at 5:29 PM, c. <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> 
>>  On 13 Apr 2014, at 23:09, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
>> 
>>>  I don't know what it means from Octave developers point of view 
> though.
>> 
>>  it means that the output is not assigned if nargout = 0.
>> 
>> 
>>  It seems to me that the fix is trivial, as the documentation says
>>  that only one output value is assigned in any case, it would probably
>>  be sufficient to change line 719 of libinterp/corefcn/input.cc from
>> 
>>  retval = eval_string (input_buf, true, parse_status, nargout);
>> 
>>  to 
>> 
>>  retval = eval_string (input_buf, true, parse_status);
>> 
>>  please add this suggestion to the report when reporting the bug.
>> 
>>  c.
> 
> I opened a bug report.
> 
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?42111
> 
> Ben
>


It's funny to read this thread - there is a reply to my statement, and the 
reply only partially quotes my statement (which contains a workaround in a 
sense), but my message isn't there yet.

The list moderator is asleep ?

--Sergei.