|
From: | Markus Bergholz |
Subject: | Re: nVIDIA cuBLAS and GNU Octave |
Date: | Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:37:02 +0100 |
2012/12/23 Markus Bergholz <address@hidden>:
And someone knows if the Intel HD graphics 4000 (present in Ivy Bridge>
>
>
> On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 7:35 PM, José Luis García Pallero
> <address@hidden> wrote:
>>
>> 2012/12/23 John W. Eaton <address@hidden>:
>> > On 23-Dec-2012, Markus Bergholz wrote:
>> >
>> > | only work if you have a cuda card and driver!), or one day the Cuda
>> > stuff and
>> > | licence gets tolareted by Octave developers.
>> >
>> > Octave's license isn't going to change, so I don't think we have a
>> > choice to someday "tolerate" a non-free, GPL-incompatible license.
>> > I'm not interested in linking Octave with non-free software, or
>> > encouraging people to do so. What we need is to have software that
>> > does the job of working with the GPU that is distributed under terms
>> > that are compatible with the GPL.
>>
>> I totally agree with this.
>>
>> One solution could be, for example, to use ViennaCL
>> (http://viennacl.sourceforge.net/). There is distributed under MIT
>> license, that is compatible with the GPL. It contains an
>> implementation if BLAS and some matrix decompositions in OpenCL. But
>> it has a problem (or I think it is a problem): is possible to use
>> OpenCL code without using non-free software? About the library
>> implementation, exists pocl (http://pocl.sourceforge.net/), but AFAIK
>> only produces code for CPUs. An the last problem is: is possible to
>> run code in a GPU without the privative drivers?
>
>
> With the Open AMD Driver, yes/soon :D
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTEwMjU
processors and with OpenCL support) needs a propietary or free driver?
--
*****************************************
José Luis García Pallero
address@hidden
(o<
/ / \
V_/_
Use Debian GNU/Linux and enjoy!
*****************************************
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |