[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2012 15:35:18 -0500 |
On 21 November 2012 15:27, edmund ronald <address@hidden> wrote:
> I like Octave because it is free and has a
> spare design, but let's face it not everyone wants to be an abstemious
> digital monk.
We are trying to make Octave less for digital monks, but it's hard work.
- Jordi G. H.
- Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, (continued)
- Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, Dimitri Maziuk, 2012/11/21
- Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, c., 2012/11/21
- Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, Dimitri Maziuk, 2012/11/21
- Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/11/21
- Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, Dimitri Maziuk, 2012/11/21
- Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/11/21
Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, Salva Ardid, 2012/11/21
Re: Octave's and Matlab's limitations, Francesco Potortì, 2012/11/21