Re: Successive Over-Relaxation ... what is wrong? Improvements?

[Sergei Steshenko]

----- Original Message -----
> From: Joza <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Cc: 
> Sent: Sunday, November 4, 2012 3:12 AM
> Subject: Re: Successive Over-Relaxation ... what is wrong? Improvements?
> 
> Yea....
> 
> I've tried a few values for the relaxation parameter and the matrix size ...
> 
> it seems that either the norm converges to a constant, or it keeps
> oscillating around a certain value.
> 
> As far as I am aware, I've followed the implementation as per textbook - I
> can't see anything obviously wrong with it. Any idea what could be causing
> this?
> 
> 
> 

Do you have any test case that converges ?

--Sergei.