Re: Successive Over-Relaxation ... what is wrong? Improvements?

[Sergei Steshenko]

--- On Fri, 11/2/12, Ed Meyer <address@hidden> wrote:

From: Ed Meyer <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: Successive Over-Relaxation ... what is wrong? Improvements?
To: "Joza" <address@hidden>
Cc: address@hidden
Date: Friday, November 2, 2012, 8:37 PM



On Fri, Nov 2, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Joza <address@hidden> wrote:


Well, here's the read-out for the last iteration:



iters: 20374    norm: 2.0769230769230695



yet



iters: 100      norm: 2.0769230769230771









--

View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Successive-Over-Relaxation-what-is-wrong-Improvements-tp4646041p4646048.html



Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________

Help-octave mailing list

address@hidden

https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave


It looks like it is oscillating about the solution, which probably means you 
need to fiddle with
the relaxation parameter

-- 
Ed Meyer



-----Inline Attachment Follows-----

_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave


IIRC, the OP says Octave built-in algorithm converges, so the problem is most 
likely an error in the OP's implementation.

Regards,
  Sergei.