|
| From: | Joza |
| Subject: | Re: Successive Over-Relaxation ... what is wrong? Improvements? |
| Date: | Fri, 2 Nov 2012 16:34:51 -0700 (PDT) |
Sorry, I forgot I shouldn't have such numbers there ... I'll replace the likes of j=999:1000 with j = n-1:n. The code works fine for a 10x10 matrix that I tried. But Octave won't churn out an answer with 1000x1000. I'm quite new to sparse matrices so I'm wondering if there are ways to speed up the code or optimize it, perhaps by taking advantage of the sparse matrix's properties? -- View this message in context: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Successive-Over-Relaxation-what-is-wrong-Improvements-tp4646041p4646046.html Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
| [Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |