[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: struct weirdness
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: struct weirdness |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:22:29 -0400 |
On 23-Aug-2012, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
| "This the square brackets should be curly" - if it's a must, and square
brackets are accepted, then we have a bug - because no error message is issued.
|
| If square brackets are allowed, then the struct element should be treated as
vector in this case, which it is not - see my earlier Email in the thread. So,
I think, we still have a bug - because square brackets are not treated as they
normally do.
It's not a bug.
The behavior is compatible with Matlab.
The [...] argument is a single Matrix object, which is a single
"scalar" element of a cell array. So somewhat consistent with
handling of scalar objects in other contexts, it is broadcast to all
dimensions of the struct array.
jwe
- struct weirdness, Przemek Klosowski, 2012/08/23
- Re: struct weirdness, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/08/23
- Re: struct weirdness, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/23
- Re: struct weirdness, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/23
- Re: struct weirdness,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: struct weirdness, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/08/24
- Re: struct weirdness, Ben Abbott, 2012/08/24
- Re: struct weirdness, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/08/24
- Re: struct weirdness, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/24
- Re: struct weirdness, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/08/25
- Re: struct weirdness, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/25
- Re: struct weirdness, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/08/25
- Re: struct weirdness, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/26
- Re: struct weirdness, Robert T. Short, 2012/08/26
- Re: struct weirdness, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/26