On 21.07.2012 20:52, Ben Abbott wrote:
Please reply at the bottom to allow those
arriving late to follow along
On 21.07.2012 18:07, Doug Stewart
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:33 AM,
Nikolai Huckle
<address@hidden>
wrote:
Hey guys,
I'm having a recurring problem with the
print-function. Everytime I try to save some of my
plots to a pdf-file, it starts saving faulty images
after maybe two good tries.
The graphs in the files look as if drawn by a child,
with a lot of data missing, barely recognizable as
the real graph.
And it doesn't matter if I try saving different
plots or in a different format (i.e. .png).
Does anyone know this problem and can maybe help me?
Thanks in advance for any information or help.
Nikolai Huckle
--
DAS
https://linuxcounter.net/user/206392.html
I'm using Windows 7 and Version 3.6,1 mingw of Octave.
Do you get similar results for both the gnuplot
and fltk graghics toolkits?
Can you give us a simple script do that we can
reproduce the problem? And attach the resulting PDF?
The results are the same for both graphics toolkits.
I have attached a little script that just plots a 2D straight line,
the resulting PDF which just has few missing data, and a PDF without
the .m-file but it shows how bad it can look.
I must add, that I might have solved the problem by myself,
accidentally. Through adding it to the script, it somehow creates
non-faulty PDF's. Before I always executed the script and then
printed the graphs in the command line.
But I'm not sure how long this will work, so it's maybe just another
hint for you, what might be wrong.
Nikolai