[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development
|
From: |
Thomas Weber |
|
Subject: |
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development |
|
Date: |
Tue, 8 Jun 2010 23:01:13 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
Jaroslav, Alois,
may I suggest that you two just agree to disagree?
Your both have good arguments, you just weigh them differently. I don't
think discussing this further will bring any benefit.
Thomas
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, (continued)
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Francesco Potortì, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Søren Hauberg, 2010/06/07
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/08
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/08
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/08
- Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development,
Thomas Weber <=
- builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ..., Alois Schlögl, 2010/06/09
- Re: builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ..., Judd Storrs, 2010/06/09
- Re: builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ..., Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/06/10
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Judd Storrs, 2010/06/07
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Alvin Wibowo, 2010/06/07
Re: Opinions on Matlab compatibility, Octave development, Matthias Brennwald, 2010/06/08