|
From: | Alois Schlögl |
Subject: | builtin vec() [was Re: Opinions ... |
Date: | Wed, 09 Jun 2010 20:36:50 +0200 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100411) |
Moreover, it might be a tool were the user experience (running the same code from some octave toolboxes) shows an advantage of Octave over Matlab because Matlab will have only an m-file implementation of vec(). Or if Mathworks is going to implement a builtin vec(), than Octave has been leading.Er, I'm not sure, but I think Matlab has no vec() at all...?Unlike the functionality of (:) in fun(x)(:), vec.m can be easily provided to the users of Matlab.Aha. So even Octave's current vec() implementation is better thanMatlab's.
I did not say that. Though a built-in would of course be yet better. I'll create
it for 10 EUR. Anyone interested? :D
I'm willing to sponsor the builtin vec() function for Octave. It's not that I personally have an immediate need for it; its because I see the possible advantages in terms of compatibility and performance (i.e. user experience) with Octave.
Alois P.S.: Tell me in a private e-mail, how I should transfer the money.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |