help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Intel Compiler] Optimisation flag does not like __va_arg_pack / un


From: Jaroslav Hajek
Subject: Re: [Intel Compiler] Optimisation flag does not like __va_arg_pack / undefined reference to __builtin_is(finite|nan|inf)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2010 09:26:22 +0200

On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Vincent Letocart
<address@hidden> wrote:
> On 21 April 2010, at 06:51:43 (Epoch+1271829103 sec), Jaroslav Hajek wrote :
>> On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 3:07 PM, Vincent Letocart
>> <address@hidden> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > I'm struggling to get octave compiled with the Intel Compiler
>> > Suite (11.1-069) on a Linux SLES 11.0.
>> >
>> > Here is the context:
>> >
>> >        > uname -a
>> >        Linux tethys 2.6.27.45-0.1-default #1 SMP 2010-02-22 16:49:47 +0100 
>> > x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>> >
>> >        > icc --version
>> >        icc (ICC) 11.1 20100203
>> >        Copyright (C) 1985-2010 Intel Corporation.  All rights reserved.
>> >
>> >        > ifort --version
>> >        ifort (IFORT) 11.1 20100203
>> >        Copyright (C) 1985-2010 Intel Corporation.  All rights reserved.
>> >
>> >        > icpc --version
>> >        icpc (ICC) 11.1 20100203
>> >        Copyright (C) 1985-2010 Intel Corporation.  All rights reserved.
>> >
>> >        > gcc --version
>> >        gcc (SUSE Linux) 4.3.2 [gcc-4_3-branch revision 141291]
>> >        Copyright (C) 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
>> >        This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.  
>> > There is NO
>> >        warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR 
>> > PURPOSE.
>> >
>> >
>> > I have actually two sort of errors. I also chosed for reproducing the 
>> > errors with a very minimal
>> > set of flags activated:
>> >
>> >    ./configure CPP=cpp CC=icc F77=ifort CXX=icpc CPPFLAGS='-w' CFLAGS='-w' 
>> > FFLAGS='-w' CXXFLAGS='-w'
>> > then
>> >        make [or make -j 8, whatever]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > An error is related to something called __va_arg_pack. Executing the 
>> > command by hand reproduces the
>> > error [here for instance, with octave-3.2.4]:
>> >
>> >        src> icpc -c -w  -I/usr/include/freetype2 -fPIC -I. -I.. 
>> > -I../liboctave -I../src -I../libcruft/misc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -Wall -W 
>> > -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast -Wformat -w -I/usr/include/freetype2 -pthread 
>> > -fmessage-length=0 -O2 -Wall -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fstack-protector 
>> > -funwind-tables -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -g -fno-strict-aliasing 
>> > -D_THREAD_SAFE -D_REENTRANT ./DLD-FUNCTIONS/fltk_backend.cc -o 
>> > pic/fltk_backend.o
>> >        /usr/include/bits/wchar2.h(290): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                   __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                          ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/wchar2.h(291): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >            return __swprintf_alias (__s, __n, __fmt, __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                                      ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/wchar2.h(340): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >            return __wprintf_chk (__USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt, 
>> > __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                                                  ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/wchar2.h(347): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                 __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                 ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(35): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                          __bos (__s), __fmt, __va_arg_pack 
>> > ());
>> >                                                              ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(66): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                           __bos (__s), __fmt, 
>> > __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                                               ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(99): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(105): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >            return __printf_chk (__USE_FORTIFY_LEVEL - 1, __fmt, 
>> > __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                                                 ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(159): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                 __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                 ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(167): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                 __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                 ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(174): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                ^
>> >        /usr/include/bits/stdio2.h(182): error: identifier 
>> > "__builtin_va_arg_pack" is undefined
>> >                                       __va_arg_pack ());
>> >                                       ^
>> >        compilation aborted for ./DLD-FUNCTIONS/fltk_backend.cc (code 2)
>> >
>> >
>> > Strangely, replacing '-O2' by '-O0' in the command line above causes the 
>> > compilation of that
>> > file to succeed.
>> >
>> > Another error involves some of the "builtin functions"" coming with the 
>> > last gcc versions.
>> > Again the octave version does not matter: 3.2.2, 3.2.4 or 3.3.51, I see no 
>> > way to
>> > bypass the problem.
>> >
>> >
>> >        icpc -w  -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I. -I.. -I../liboctave -I../src 
>> > -I../libcruft/misc  -DHAVE_CONFIG_H  -Wall -W -Wshadow -Wold-style-cast 
>> > -Wformat -w -I/usr/include/freetype2 -pthread -rdynamic \
>> >                -L..  -fPIC  -o octave \
>> >                main.o  \
>> >                -L../liboctave -L../libcruft -L../src -Wl,-rpath 
>> > -Wl,/usr/local/lib/octave-3.2.4 \
>> >                -loctinterp -loctave  -lcruft   \
>> >                     \
>> >                    \
>> >                -lfftw3 -lfftw3f   -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lGL -lGLU \
>> >                -lX11  -lreadline  -lncurses -ldl -lz -lm  -lfreetype -lz 
>> > -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lGL -lGLU -lz -L/opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/069/lib/intel64 
>> > -limf -lm -lfreetype -L/usr/X11R6/lib -lGL -lGLU 
>> > -L/opt/intel/Compiler/11.1/069/mkl/lib/em64t -L/usr/local/lib64 
>> > -L/usr/local/lib64/../lib64 -L/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3 
>> > -L/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../lib64 -L/lib/../lib64 
>> > -L/usr/lib/../lib64 
>> > -L/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../../../x86_64-suse-linux/lib 
>> > -L/usr/lib64/gcc/x86_64-suse-linux/4.3/../../.. -L/lib64 -L/lib 
>> > -L/usr/lib64 -L/usr/lib -lifport -lifcore -lsvml -lipgo -lirc -lpthread 
>> > -lirc_s -ldl
>> >        ../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `__builtin_isfinite'
>> >        ../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `__builtin_isnan'
>> >        ../src/liboctinterp.so: undefined reference to `__builtin_isinf'
>> >        make[2]: *** [octave] Error 1
>> >        make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/octave-3.2.4/src'
>> >
>> >
>> > In the list of alternatives, I made an attempt to set optimization flag to 
>> > -O0, an attempt
>> > to redefine those __builtin* symbols at link time, but I got no optimistic 
>> > result (other
>> > symbols not found, or an usable octave binary).
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Does anyone know a way to avoid those problems ? Magic flag, or even some 
>> > substitution
>> > to apply to the configure/Makefile ? What other information should be 
>> > useful ?
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks for your time
>> >
>> > VincneT.
>> >
>> > --
>>
>> Intel C++ is designed to work with gcc's headers, so it's supposed to
>> either recognize gcc's builtins, or use a replacement header. So I
>> think it's a problem in Intel C++. A quick search turned this up:
>> http://software.intel.com/en-us/forums/showthread.php?t=64188
>> it seems to confirm it's an Intel C++ bug. However, there's no
>> definite hint of a working version.
>>
>> The only advice I can give you is to compile gcc 4.1.x, that works for
>> me with Intel C++ 11.0.
>>
>> hth
>
>
> I agree with your relevant remark: they aim at making compatible compilers.
> However, that problem would have been fixed since 11.1-057:
>
> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-professional-edition-compilers-111-fixes-list/
>
> On the other side, I feel a bit screwed by the SLES 11, as the
> default gcc version coming with that release is 4.3.3.
>
> I have two other options: a guru tells me some tricky tips to get
> it working with gcc 4.3.x (flag, change in config/Makefile), or
> I pray a lot again and substitue the "compiler-triplet" (icc,ifort,icpc)
> by (gcc,ifort,g++) version 4.3.3 ?
>
> Vincent.
>
>

If you're OK with g++, why not just use (gcc,gfortran,g++)?

-- 
RNDr. Jaroslav Hajek, PhD
computing expert & GNU Octave developer
Aeronautical Research and Test Institute (VZLU)
Prague, Czech Republic
url: www.highegg.matfyz.cz



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]