Re: Plotting with 3.2.0 on Windows is SLOOOOOOWWWW

[Tatsuro MATSUOKA]

Hello

--- Francesco Potorti`  wrote:

> 
> I have not understood the last paragraph, however the memory amount
> between the two systems (512M versus 1G) could make a significant
> difference, if the working set of the kernel, octave and gnuplot exceeds
> 512MB. 
> 

It is possible. However the slowness did not occur on octave 3.2.0 on 
cygwin-1.7.  

See
http://www.nabble.com/Re:-Plotting-with-3.2.0-on-Windows-is-SLOOOOOOWWWW-p24706929.html

Do you think that Octave 3.2.0 on cygwin uses smaller size of memory than that 
by octave 3.2.0 native
to windows (octave built by MinGW) ?

I cannot deny the possibility at the moment.

Anyway I would like to test John's patch at the computer in my home.

Regards

Tatsuro  

--------------------------------------
Power up the Internet with Yahoo! Toolbar.
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/toolbar/