[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: about Octave's syntax
From: |
Søren Hauberg |
Subject: |
Re: about Octave's syntax |
Date: |
Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:20:28 +0200 |
tor, 02 07 2009 kl. 00:08 -0700, skrev Sergei Steshenko:
> --- On Wed, 7/1/09, Søren Hauberg <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > From: Søren Hauberg <address@hidden>
> > Subject: Re: about Octave's syntax
> > To: "Eduardo Alejandro Cuesta Llanes" <address@hidden>
> > Cc: address@hidden
> > Date: Wednesday, July 1, 2009, 12:44 PM
> > ons, 01 07 2009 kl. 10:16 -0400,
> > skrev Eduardo Alejandro Cuesta Llanes:
> > > I need the formal Octave's syntax for make a
> > parser...
> >
> > Well, you do have access to the source code, so why not
> > just inspect the
> > code for the actual parser? Or perhaps just use the parser
> > instead of
> > writing your own...
> >
> > Søren
> >
>
> Or perhaps never-ever look into 'octave' source code in order to never be
> accused of violating GPL ...
Is that a flame-bait? I'll bite anyway... It is trivial to avoid
violating the GPL: just release your code! If you somehow oppose the
GPL, then I don't see why you would use Octave or why anybody here would
want to help you.
Søren
- about Octave's syntax, Eduardo Alejandro Cuesta Llanes, 2009/07/01
- Re: about Octave's syntax, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/07/02
- Re: about Octave's syntax,
Søren Hauberg <=
- Re: about Octave's syntax, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/07/02
- Re: about Octave's syntax, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/07/02
- Re: about Octave's syntax, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/07/02
- Re: about Octave's syntax, Sergei Steshenko, 2009/07/02