[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
addpath(), path() vs. pathsep()
From: |
Christian Böhme |
Subject: |
addpath(), path() vs. pathsep() |
Date: |
Tue, 26 May 2009 22:25:08 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux ppc; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081204 Iceape/1.1.14 (Debian-1.1.14-1) |
Hello,
I am trying to have Octave use a path separator (`;') different
from the one (`:') that, for reasons escaping me, is defined as
"system-dependent" and not customisable. I do this by adding the
following code to my ~/.octaverc:
function s = local_pathsep();
s = ';';
endfunction
dispatch('pathsep', 'local_pathsep', 'any');
Invoking pathsep() in each Octave instance on the command line
then does indeed return
ans = ;
which is the expected answer. However, adding a directory with
a path component containing a colon still fails due to Octave
splitting the path string at each colon and complaining about
the non-existing directory entry.
Although it appears that there was a discussion on the topic
years ago (http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-pathsep-in-rmpath%2C\
-addpath-and-path-td4225829.html#a4228312) pathsep() is apparently
(still) not used by addpath() & friends. The version I am using is
3.0.5 on the current Debian "testing" distribution.
Is there any way other than manipulating the Octave sources that
allows me to use a path separator of my own personal choice ?
Thanks & regards,
Christian
- addpath(), path() vs. pathsep(),
Christian Böhme <=