[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
addpath(), path() vs. pathsep()
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
addpath(), path() vs. pathsep() |
Date: |
Tue, 26 May 2009 17:23:49 -0400 |
On 26-May-2009, Christian Böhme wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I am trying to have Octave use a path separator (`;') different
| from the one (`:') that, for reasons escaping me, is defined as
| "system-dependent" and not customisable. I do this by adding the
| following code to my ~/.octaverc:
|
| function s = local_pathsep();
| s = ';';
| endfunction
|
| dispatch('pathsep', 'local_pathsep', 'any');
|
| Invoking pathsep() in each Octave instance on the command line
| then does indeed return
|
| ans = ;
|
| which is the expected answer. However, adding a directory with
| a path component containing a colon still fails due to Octave
| splitting the path string at each colon and complaining about
| the non-existing directory entry.
|
| Although it appears that there was a discussion on the topic
| years ago (http://www.nabble.com/Use-of-pathsep-in-rmpath%2C\
| -addpath-and-path-td4225829.html#a4228312) pathsep() is apparently
| (still) not used by addpath() & friends. The version I am using is
| 3.0.5 on the current Debian "testing" distribution.
You are right that the pathsep function is not called internally.
I checked in the following changes to the current sources:
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/cf4683ff0b2c
http://hg.savannah.gnu.org/hgweb/octave/rev/1d3b91166b9c
I don't expect that these patches will apply to the 3.0.x sources.
Out of curiosity, why do you want to change the path separator? Do
you use ":" in directory names? Why?
jwe