|
From: | John W. Eaton |
Subject: | Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop) |
Date: | Thu, 2 Apr 2009 13:25:50 -0400 |
On 2-Apr-2009, Rob Mahurin wrote: | Any idea why (1:n)(1:n) makes a full matrix more quickly than [1:n]? | Just looking at timing, it looks like [] waits for something that () | () doesn't. I would have expected any difference to go the other way. What do you mean by "more quickly?" jwe
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |