[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop)
From: |
r |
Subject: |
Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop) |
Date: |
Wed, 1 Apr 2009 21:15:26 +0100 |
I've recently hit a performance problem with a "for" loop producing
vectors of data. Consider the following (deliberately simple) example:
function retval = test(n)
# retval = zeros(1, n);
for n = [1:n]
retval(n) = n;
endfor
endfunction
octave:26> tic;test(10000);toc
Elapsed time is 0.8 seconds.
octave:27> tic;test(100000);toc
Elapsed time is 72 seconds.
So the complexity is O(n^2).
The same function with a preallocated retval vector:
function retval = test2(n)
retval = zeros(1, n);
for n = [1:n]
retval(n) = n;
endfor
endfunction
has a complexity of O(n):
octave:29> tic;test2(10000);toc
Elapsed time is 0.16 seconds.
octave:30> tic;test2(100000);toc
Elapsed time is 1.9 seconds.
Is it possible to adjust the Octave's allocation algorithm so that it
could allocate larger chunks of data (or growing chunks of data)?
Regards,
-r.
- Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop),
r <=
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), James Sherman Jr., 2009/04/01
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), r, 2009/04/01
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), James Sherman Jr., 2009/04/01
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), Rob Mahurin, 2009/04/01
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), Elias Assmann, 2009/04/02
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), James Sherman Jr., 2009/04/02
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), John W. Eaton, 2009/04/02
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), Elias Assmann, 2009/04/02
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), Rob Mahurin, 2009/04/02
- Re: Performance optimization (allocation inside a for loop), John W. Eaton, 2009/04/02