Re: findobj.m

[David Bateman]

Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Thursday, September 27, 2007, at 08:37AM, "David Bateman" <address@hidden> 
> wrote:
>   
>> I believe the attached version addresses the issues I mentioned with the
>> previous version of findobj.m. John do you want it?
>>
>> D.
>>     
>
> Thanks David. I'll review the differences and make notes for any future 
> efforts. 
>
> I'll also see what I can do about checking/debugging the "-regexp" 
> functionality. I've got a copy of Matlab available to compare against.
>
> Can you, or another, verify that the regexp() functions in Octave and Matlab 
> operate in a consistent manner?
>
>   
Hey I wrote regexp, so of course it is consistent :-) .... Seriously
there were some inconsistencies in the handling of cell arrays, but I
believe the unitary tests at the end of the regexp.cc file now test well
of compatibility..

D.

-- 
David Bateman                                address@hidden
Motorola Labs - Paris                        +33 1 69 35 48 04 (Ph) 
Parc Les Algorithmes, Commune de St Aubin    +33 6 72 01 06 33 (Mob) 
91193 Gif-Sur-Yvette FRANCE                  +33 1 69 35 77 01 (Fax) 

The information contained in this communication has been classified as: 

[x] General Business Information 
[ ] Motorola Internal Use Only 
[ ] Motorola Confidential Proprietary