[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nnz and char
From: |
Andy Adler |
Subject: |
Re: nnz and char |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Jan 2006 10:04:21 -0500 (EST) |
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006, David Bateman wrote:
> This patch is not quite right. The problem is that there are two methods
> in Sparse<T> for the number of non-zero elements. These are "nnz" and
> "nonzero". "nnz" returns the size of data and ridx, while nonzero
> returns "cidx[ncol]"... For matlab compatiablity for sparse matrices,
> Fnnz should return "cidx[ncol]" rather than the size of ridx and data,
> which is why the old Fnnz in sparse.cc used the "nonzero" method of
> Sparse<T>..
David,
I'm embarassed to admit this, but I can't figure out what you said.
Could you explain what the difference is between cidx[ncol] and
length( ridx )?
--
Andy Adler <address@hidden> 1(613)562-5800x6218
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- nnz and char, Andrew Funk, 2006/01/30
- nnz and char, John W. Eaton, 2006/01/30
- Message not available
- Re: nnz and char, David Bateman, 2006/01/31
- Message not available
- Re: nnz and char, David Bateman, 2006/01/31
- Re: nnz and char, John W. Eaton, 2006/01/31
- Re: nnz and char, David Bateman, 2006/01/31
- Re: nnz and char, John W. Eaton, 2006/01/31
- Re: nnz and char, David Bateman, 2006/01/31
- Re: nnz and char, John W. Eaton, 2006/01/31
- Message not available
- Re: nnz and char, David Bateman, 2006/01/31
- Re: nnz and char, John W. Eaton, 2006/01/31