[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: speed of octave interpreter, changed to vecorization
From: |
Henry F. Mollet |
Subject: |
Re: speed of octave interpreter, changed to vecorization |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Sep 2005 18:54:32 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Microsoft-Entourage/11.1.0.040913 |
I'm working on least square fitting. Below is for linear model function y =
b1 + b2*x. I can calculate the loss function (aka sum of squared residuals)
loss(i,j)=resid'*resid;
in parameter space using nested for loops but I'd like to calculate the loss
function with a meshgrid. How can I do this? (I'd like to graph contour
plots of the loss function in parameter space.)
The 'for' loop for 101x101 =~10+4 calculations took
elapsed_time = 2.1996
cpu_time = 2.0928
My apparently feeble effort to use a meshgrid first failed (as per below)
and when I somehow was able to use a meshgrid (not shown) it took
elapsed_time = 0.50147
cpu_time = 0.30624
for only 3 out of the needed 101x101 = ~10+4 needed points. Thus there's no
point showing what I've tried.
Henry
% Nested for loops over b1 and b2 via integers i and j for calc of loss =
loss (b1,b2) in parameter space.
for i=1:101
for j=1:101
b1=0.0+(i-1)*(20.0-0.0)/100;
b2=1.8+(j-1)*(2.2-1.8)/100;
r=(Y(:)-b1-b2.*X(:));
loss(i,j)=r'*r;
end
end
% Now trying to calculate loss in parameter space using a meshgrid for a =
b1 and b = b2:
a=linspace(0,20,101);
b=linspace(1.8,2.2,101);
[aa,bb]= meshgrid (a,b);
LossViaMeshGrid = (Y(:) - aa - bb.*X(:))' * (Y(:) - aa - bb.*X(:));
%error: operator -: nonconformant arguments (op1 is 10x1, op2 is 101x101)
%error: evaluating binary operator `-' near line 67, column 24
% I can see that arguments of op1 and op2 don't agree but the number of data
points is a vector of length n, say, and the meshgrid has dimension mxm,
say.
on 9/27/05 2:23 PM, Paul Thomas at address@hidden wrote:
> David,
>
> It is also worth recalling the correspondence around that time about
> vectorization. The slow tests can be speeded up by one or two orders of
> magnitude by replacing fortran77 style code with "vectorized" code. I
> remind everybody of this excellent technical note from the other
> product, which applies just as well to octave:
>
> http://www.mathworks.com/support/tech-notes/1100/1109.html
>
> Paul T
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
>
> Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
> -------------------------------------------------------------
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, (continued)
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Robert A. Macy, 2005/09/25
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Stefan van der Walt, 2005/09/25
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Brian Blais, 2005/09/25
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Robert A. Macy, 2005/09/25
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, John W. Eaton, 2005/09/26
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Mike Miller, 2005/09/26
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Robert A. Macy, 2005/09/26
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Mike Miller, 2005/09/26
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, David Bateman, 2005/09/27
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Paul Thomas, 2005/09/27
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, changed to vecorization,
Henry F. Mollet <=
- Message not available
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Mike Miller, 2005/09/27
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, David Bateman, 2005/09/28
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Brendan Drew, 2005/09/28
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, David Bateman, 2005/09/29
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Brian Blais, 2005/09/26
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Francesco Potorti`, 2005/09/26
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, John W. Eaton, 2005/09/26
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Javier Arantegui, 2005/09/27
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Mike Miller, 2005/09/27
- Re: speed of octave interpreter, Javier Arantegui, 2005/09/27