Re: Octave-forge: you get what you pay for

[Paul Kienzle]

On Jun 15, 2005, at 12:48 PM, Quentin Spencer wrote:

> Keith Goodman wrote:
>
> > On 6/15/05, Vic Norton <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I reported this problem with lp to the powers that be over 4 years  
> > > ago.
> >
> > I think a bug tracking system would be helpful (for Octave and for
> > Octave-Forge). Then people could at least check to see if there are
> > any open bugs on any complicated functions they use like lp.
> I agree with this, but I think it's more important for octave-forge.
> With octave, I've never had a bug that didn't get looked at by John or
> someone else eventually. With octave-forge, if someone doesn't respond
> right away, it tends to get forgotten. The funny thing is,
> sourceforge.net has a bug tracking system, but we've just never really
> used it. Maybe it's time we do so.

There's one for you just arrived today.  Fedora Core 1 make check fails
with a segmentation fault.

http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php? 
func=detail&aid=1221384&group_id=2888&atid=102888

Subscribe to address@hidden to get notification of
new bugs as they arrive.

- Paul



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------