Re: A little more privacy

[robert Macy]

Yes, it's a good reason, but can be accomplished by using
"encoded" techniques, like 
     macy AT california DOT com

Anyone reading would understand but spam would reduce.  

ALSO!  I keep responding by hitting "reply", not "reply to
all" which keeps cutting out the group.  

              - Robert -

On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:58:46 +0100
 Lute Kamstra <address@hidden> wrote:
> Christoph Dalitz <address@hidden>
> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, 06 Nov 2003 11:29:46 +0100
> > Lute Kamstra <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> >> The problem can be solved by deleting email addresses
> from web
> >> archives and adding buttons that give you those email
> addresses.
> >> This way, spider bots don't find the email addresses,
> but humans
> >> do.
> > 
> > Why should any non list member be able to find the
> email addresses
> > of list members over the archives? I would prefer to
> protect email
> > addresses entirely.
> 
> Now and then, I look into web archives of mailing lists
> that I'm not
> subscribed to.  (For example, to see if it is worth my
> while to
> subscribe.)  Sometimes I read something interesting and
> I'd like to
> contact the author about it.  Isn't that a legitimate
> reason to get an
> email address?
> 
>   Lute.
> 
> 
> 
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
> Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU
> GPL.
> 
> Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
> How to fund new projects:
>  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
> Subscription information:
>  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
>
-------------------------------------------------------------
> 



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------