Re: silent_functions ignored?

[Nathan]

On 15 Aug 2001 23:22:19 -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> Can you please provide an example that fails?
The example you gave earlier worked as you said it would.  
> Simple things like
> 
>   function f ()
>     1
>     2
>   endfunction
> 
> seem to work correctly for me (i.e., setting silent_functions to 1
> suppresses printing of both 1 and 2 in this function).  I'm checking
> by running 2.1.34.
> 
> BTW, did Red Hat leave the startup statement about 2.1.33 being a
> development version of Octave, or are they passing it off as a
> released version, as they did for gcc 2.96?  1/2 :-)
> 
> jwe




-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------