Re: Some trouble with gcc-3.0

[BERTRAND Joël]

Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:

> BERTRAND Joël <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Trond Eivind Glomsrød wrote:
> >
> > > I recommend trying octave 2.1.34 - I'd be very surprised if 2.0.16
> > > compiles with gcc 3.
> >
> >     I have tried to recompile a 2.1.34, but, the compilation stage aborts
> > at
>
> That looks like a bug in gcc 3 - I suggest you report it to the gcc
> team: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html

    It's done.

> In the mean time, your best choice (if you're running Linux) may be
> the 2.96RH compiler you can find at
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/linux/rawhide/alpha/RedHat/RPMS/

    I cannot, because I work on a big project that doesn't compile with
gcc-2.96 (C and F77), and I have some trouble with recompiled kernels
when I use this compiler on alpha processor.

> It's doesn't have all the bells and whistles of gcc 3, but it's a lot
> more battle proven  and has a good performance increase over gcc 2.95.x for
> Alpha, in addition to being more C++ compliant (and because of it
> being more compliant, you'll need octave 2.1)

    Regards,

    JKB



-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.

Octave's home on the web:  http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects:  http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information:  http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------