[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
F**king matlab!
From: |
Douglas Eck |
Subject: |
F**king matlab! |
Date: |
Fri, 08 Dec 2000 20:52:06 -0700 |
Does the code have to fork to have matlab compatibility
and next-generation growth? I don't think so.
I agree with John that true compatibility is a myth... we'll always
be chasing. But at the same time it is at least theoretically
possible to have a matlab compatibity *layer* at some level in the code.
I recommend that at the lowest level, the next
generation GPL numerical analysis software pacakge
make no attempt to be a matlab clone. *But* I recommend
that it be desiged so that at a fairly low level,
it can interpret code from other languages. Primarily
matlab. This should free up those who want to build
something cool while leaving the door open for matlab-like
behavior.
Problem is, I only passed graduate progamming languages at
Indiana University because fellow-student Paul Kienzle
basically gave me his homework. Ok not quite, but close.
So this might be completely wrong.
What do you think?
Doug
-------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.octave.org
How to fund new projects: http://www.octave.org/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.octave.org/archive.html
-------------------------------------------------------------
Re: The future of Octave, Rafael Laboissiere, 2000/12/08
RE: The future of Octave, Ted Harding, 2000/12/10
Fwd: Re: The future of Octave, Jonathan Drews, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Michele, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Etienne Grossmann, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Paul Kienzle, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Etienne Grossmann, 2000/12/08
Re: The future of Octave, Phil Cummins, 2000/12/10
Re: The future of Octave, Jonathan King, 2000/12/11