[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ATLAS and octave
From: |
chenu-tournier marc |
Subject: |
Re: ATLAS and octave |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Feb 2000 05:31:03 -0500 (EST) |
Hello.
I'm constantly looking for more performance in floating point operations but
I'm stuck to matlab.
I have compiled on my dual pII 300 under Mandrake 7.0 octave 2.0.15 linked
to atlas as jwe proposed it and for the operation
a=rand(1000);b=rand(1000);
t=cputime;a*b;cputime-t
there is indeed a factor 10 for ATLAS
but for
R=0;x=rand(512,1)+j*rand(512,1);
t=cputime;R=R+x*x';;cputime-t
I have lost some time!
normal octave gives .3 sec
Altas ocatve gives .4 sec
Can you confirm this and do you have an idea why this happens?
Thanks
______________________________________________
FREE Personalized Email at Mail.com
Sign up at http://www.mail.com?sr=mc.mk.mcm.tag001
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Octave is freely available under the terms of the GNU GPL.
Octave's home on the web: http://www.che.wisc.edu/octave/octave.html
How to fund new projects: http://www.che.wisc.edu/octave/funding.html
Subscription information: http://www.che.wisc.edu/octave/archive.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: ATLAS and octave, (continued)
- Re: ATLAS and octave, stevenj, 2000/02/05
- Re: ATLAS and octave, R Clint Whaley, 2000/02/05
- Re: ATLAS and octave, R Clint Whaley, 2000/02/05
- Re: ATLAS and octave, stevenj, 2000/02/05
- Re: ATLAS and octave, R Clint Whaley, 2000/02/09
- Re: ATLAS and octave, R Clint Whaley, 2000/02/09
- Re: ATLAS and octave, Steven G. Johnson, 2000/02/09
- Re: ATLAS and octave,
chenu-tournier marc <=